Is it me or is it that most people think that being good on the mic is a proitey over being a good wrestler?

I think that is dumb, look at beniot(I know what he did was pretty wrong), he was never good on the mic and got over on his great wretling skills, but all I hear was he should have never been champion because he lacked the MOST IMPORTANT THING mic skills. Mic skills are secondary to me. I think if a wrestler can get over, and wrestle in a ring it is good. I enjoyed when stone cold and the rock wrestled, their mic skills were just extra to me. I like brawlers a lot. BTW I know wwe views it as that, but that is secondary to how enjoy a wrestler. I can't blame wwe on not giving shelton benjemen the belt due to him not being over, if the fans do not want it, then you cannot give it to them. However jeff hardy is over, but his in ring skills just suck a lot so I do not think he is that good and should have never been champion. NOW mic skills being a part of it, I can understand, but can't understand them being more important.